Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #6584

Handling unit multiplier needs joint WG concensus on approach

Added by Todd Viegut about 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
High
Solution Version:
Breaking Change:
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13, WG14, WG16, WG21
Requestor:
Todd Viegut
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

Handling unit multiplier

WG13 needed a policy with respect to how unit multpliers are to be exchanged. For example CDPSM has need for Length to be in km for line length, but in meters for conductor spacing. IEC 61970-552 does not provide for the exchange of unit symbols or unit multpliers. Therefore, manual documentation is required in profiles. Possibly different model parts assembled together may have different unit multipliers such as combining a distribution and transmission model together. With current work in progress for the upcoming IEC 61970-301 Ed 8.0 (i.e. CIM18) and the accompanying editions of IEC 61970-452, IEC 61970-456, etc. there is the planned introduction of the new unbalanced profiles which will require concensus on an approach.

WG13 has issue: https://redmine.ucaiug.org/issues/5014 for addressing this cross-cutting concern within the context of WG13. This CIM Joint issue is to raise visibility across WG14, WG16, WG21 so that we have a common understanding/policy for how we will address this.

Also available in: Atom PDF