CIM Issues » WG14 Issues

The first suggestef "Proposed Solution" is an example of that a better description could have helped the situation.
The descriptions should rather, if updated like this, be:
xPosition: X axis position, e.g. latitude.
yPosition: Y axis position, e.g. longitude.
zPosition: (If applicable) Z axis position, e.g. altitude.

I like your proposed clarification that X=longitude, Y=latitude, Z=altitude.
There are different coordinate systems, and it will be necessary to specify the coordinate system in use.
The unit of measure will also vary. Most use the legacy degrees, minutes, seconds measurement style. Many newer electronic systems use decimal degrees.

However, there are more wrinkles to this. Poles typically have an assigned position on a map. But conductors are strung between them. They will blow with the wind. Anti-vibration devices, spacers, and other equipment will be "located" not with the same XYZ positioning, but rather some distance down the line relative to a pole position.

The poles themselves are assets. They may eventually tilt over time. Given that the base has an XYZ position, the pole itself can lean, but how do you describe the lean? I'm planning to add to Part 9 (because sensors can measure this lean) that a "tilt" measurement be made in degrees and expressed (per the understanding above) as an angle in the XZ plane or YZ plane. Now, to make matters worse, these pole mounted sensors are not aligned when they are installed with geographic North. They are aligned facing the street so the person in the bucket truck can access them. So we need also to measure absolute and relative alignments per different points of reference.