Project

General

Profile

Bug #609

The value of the DO LLN0.Health of a LD should inherit from the alarm status of LPHD0.PhyHealth of the IED nesting the LD

Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Solved / Missunderstanding
Start date:
10/07/2020
Due date:
10/08/2020
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
0.25 h
ID:
1
Source:
RTE
TF Unique ID:
1 # RTE
WG10 Proposal:

LPHD.PhyHealth and LLN0.Health are not the same, although they can be the same in specific implementations. And LPHD.PhyHealth is mandatory but LLN0.Health is optional.

Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

LPHD.PhyHealth and LLN0.Health are not the same

Standard(s):
Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

LLN0.Health of a LD should be the worst case taking into account LPHD0.PhyHealth = 3 of the IED hosting the LD and the operational status of the application represented by the LD. Relevant functional standards and / or BAP may define criteria applicable for the application.
The meaning of "Health" should not be different for several IEDs in a system

#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Due date set to 10/08/2020
  • Category changed from Standard clarification required to Solved / Missunderstanding
  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • Estimated time set to 0.25 h
  • Short Proposal set to LPHD.PhyHealth and LLN0.Health are not the same
  • WG10 Proposal set to LPHD.PhyHealth and LLN0.Health are not the same, although they can be the same in specific implementations. And LPHD.PhyHealth is mandatory but LLN0.Health is optional.
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No

2021-03-02: Issue is closed

Also available in: Atom PDF