Support #554
Performance requirement for SV and implications to Protection applications
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Profile or Guideline
Start date:
02/16/2021
Due date:
08/16/2021 (over 3 years late)
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
1
Source:
H30
TF Unique ID:
1 # H30
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
TC95/WG2 will cover the issue
Standard(s):
Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
Description
• Loss of GOOSE is equivalent to traditional
• SV reliability implications?
Loose of SV is equivalent to losing the CT/PT signal
Protection applications typically need reliability (less than 1 electrical cycle). Currently SV profiles block protection element.
Performance requirement for SV (to be defined). To be completed by H30
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 4 years ago
- Subject changed from • Loss of GOOSE is equivalent to traditional • SV reliability implications? Loose of SV is equivalent to losing the CT/PT signa to Performance requirement for SV and implications to Protection applications
- Category set to Profile or Guideline
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 4 years ago
- Due date set to 08/16/2021
- Status changed from Accepted to Triage
- Start date set to 02/16/2021
- Short Proposal set to H30 to provide more details.
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
H30 to provide more details.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Short Proposal changed from H30 to provide more details. to TC95/WG2 will cover the issue
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Needs More Information set to Yes
IEC 60255-216-1 TR (under revision) proposes how it can be done.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Needs More Information changed from Yes to No