Feature #542
Problem in engineering workflow due to definition of SMVsc.max
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
23
Source:
IOP_2017/38
TF Unique ID:
23 # IOP_2017/38
WG10 Proposal:
fix the definition of max for SMVsc according to GOOSE-> OK: Specified in part 6
Estimated Completion:
(2019-06) No target date was set.
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:
Refer to WG10.Conclusion: Table 11 needs to be corrected so that max for MSV is the same definition for as GOOSE and Report Control.
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-6
Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:
Description
An SCT deleted 2 sampled value control blocks out of 4, because in SMVsc, the value max was set to 2.
The reason that the ICT had max set to 2 was, that it wanted to express that out of the 4 a maximum of 2 is allowed to be activated.
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from An SCT deleted 2 sampled value control blocks out of 4, because in SMVsc, the value max was set to 2. The reason that the ICT h to Problem in engineering workflow due to definition of SMVsc.max
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Short Proposal changed from Refer to WG10. Conclusion: Table 11 needs to be corrected so that max for MSV is the same definition for as GOOSE and Report Control. to Refer to WG10.Conclusion: Table 11 needs to be corrected so that max for MSV is the same definition for as GOOSE and Report Control.
- Standard(s) changed from 6 to IEC 61850-6
- WG10 Proposal changed from fix the definition of max for SMVsc according to GOOSE -> OK (2019-06): Specified in part 6 to fix the definition of max for SMVsc according to GOOSE-> OK(2019-06): Specified in part 6
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Confirm to IEC 61850-6 editor that this issue has been accounted for.