Feature #534
A GCB or MSVCB can only have one single control block address entry in the whole communication section
0%
reference added is more generic, indicating that rule for communication aspect has to be considered while reading the part 6-> OK: Specified in 6, 7-2 Table 2
Refer to WG10.Suggest adding reference to 7-2 Table 1 Note which states:” All the services for spontaneous sending are limited to one access point per control block instance” for 9.4.4 and 9.4.5.
IEC 61850-6, IEC 61850-7-2
Description
SCD import of IntegratedApplication.scdHVv5 to ICT generated the following error:
A GOOSE or Sampled Value Control Block can only have one single control block address entry in the whole communication section. Adding a second control block address was denied for GoCB Name='gcb1' Description='BreakerControl' Ref='GE_C264_LINE_1CONTROL/LLN0.gcb1'
The two AP’s are connected to different subnets, but they belong to the same IED.
Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 3 years ago
- Subject changed from SCD import of IntegratedApplication.scdHVv5 to ICT generated the following error: A GOOSE or Sampled Value Control Block can on to A GCB or MSVCB can only have one single control block address entry in the whole communication section
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Short Proposal changed from Refer to WG10. Suggest adding reference to 7-2 Table 1 Note which states:” All the services for spontaneous sending are limited to one access point per control block instance” for 9.4.4 and 9.4.5. to Refer to WG10.Suggest adding reference to 7-2 Table 1 Note which states:” All the services for spontaneous sending are limited to one access point per control block instance” for 9.4.4 and 9.4.5.
- Standard(s) changed from 6,7-2 to IEC 61850-6, IEC 61850-7-2
- WG10 Proposal changed from reference added is more generic, indicating that rule for communication aspect has to be considered while reading the part 6 -> OK (2019-06): Specified in 6, 7-2 Table 2 to reference added is more generic, indicating that rule for communication aspect has to be considered while reading the part 6-> OK(2019-06): Specified in 6, 7-2 Table 2
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 2 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Confirm to IEC 61850-6 editor that this issue has been accounted for.