Project

General

Profile

Feature #530

SCT is passing ICD errors to SCD.

Added by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago. Updated almost 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
11
Source:
IOP_2017/20
TF Unique ID:
11 # IOP_2017/20
WG10 Proposal:

Add reference to part 7-1 §14 in part 6 §9.5.1 (datatype template) to indicate that datamodel restriction is defined by 7-1 -> OK: Specified in 6 Ed2.1 section 9.5.1

Estimated Completion:
(2019-06) No target date was set.
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:

Where in the engineering workflow is SCL validation required?Suggest adding text from 7-1 14.5.4 restricting the extension of CDCs to somewhere in -6 lines 327-329 or add a direct reference to the clause in 7-1.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

V4.1 of the SCD file contains an invalid device;

1. The T2WPDIF logical contains DOs of TotW, TotVAr, TotVA, TotPF, Hz and PhV
2. The timestamp for the MV associated with the TotX and Hz elements is in the ST functional constraint.
These errors are in the ICD file. Seems like an SCT should have prevented this from being passed to the SCD?

#1

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from V4.1 of the SCD file contains an invalid device; 1. The T2WPDIF logical contains DOs of TotW, TotVAr, TotVA, TotPF, Hz and PhV to SCT is passing ICD errors to SCD.
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Short Proposal changed from Where in the engineering workflow is SCL validation required? Suggest adding text from 7-1 14.5.4 restricting the extension of CDCs to somewhere in -6 lines 327-329 or add a direct reference to the clause in 7-1. to Where in the engineering workflow is SCL validation required?Suggest adding text from 7-1 14.5.4 restricting the extension of CDCs to somewhere in -6 lines 327-329 or add a direct reference to the clause in 7-1.
  • Standard(s) changed from 6 to IEC 61850-6
  • WG10 Proposal changed from Add reference to part 7-1 §14 in part 6 §9.5.1 (datatype template) to indicate that datamodel restriction is defined by 7-1 -> OK (2019-06): Specified in 6 Ed2.1 section 9.5.1 to Add reference to part 7-1 §14 in part 6 §9.5.1 (datatype template) to indicate that datamodel restriction is defined by 7-1 -> OK(2019-06): Specified in 6 Ed2.1 section 9.5.1
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done.

#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

Confirm to IEC 61850-6 editor that this issue has been accounted for.

Also available in: Atom PDF