Project

General

Profile

Bug #458

ICD issue when cBName="fix" but not all the RCBs has been declared

Added by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
High
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
15
Source:
IOP_2013
TF Unique ID:
15 # IOP_2013
WG10 Proposal:

According to Cathedral City meeting (ref. to UFTF-CathedralMOM20160219) this issue is closed.

Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:

Vendor ICD with CBname = fix should declare all RCBs

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

During discussions, a question arose in regards to if there is a RCB with cBName=”fix” and the maximum number of RCBs has not been reached, is it legal to create new RCBs.
61850-6 does not answer this question.

#1

Updated by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to High
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from During discussions, a question arose in regards to if there is a RCB with cBName=”fix” and the maximum number of RCBs has not be to ICD issue when cBName="fix" but not all the RCBs has been declared
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done

Also available in: Atom PDF