Bug #446
The actual format required for an ClientLN (used for ReportControl Block reservation) is not specified fully or in an understand
Status:
Closed
Priority:
High
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
ID:
3
Source:
IOP_2013
TF Unique ID:
3 # IOP_2013
WG10 Proposal:
According to Cathedral City meeting (ref. to UFTF-CathedralMOM20160219) this issue is closed.
Estimated Completion:
Ed2.1 part6
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:
Change in part 6 from arbitrary value and recommended LD0 to "shall be LD0".
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-6
Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:
Description
The actual format required for an ClientLN (used for ReportControl Block reservation) is not specified fully or in an understandable way.
LDInst is required, but for Client only IEDs, there is no LD. The standard indicates to select a random LDInst and provides some guidance. However, in order to insure that there is interoperability and that importers understand that there is NO LDInst, the value to indicate this needs to be standardized. Recommend the use of “none”.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.