Project

General

Profile

Issues #648

Is MICS to be deprecated

Added by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Due date:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Issue forwarded to UF TF
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
Future Improvement
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

MICS has proven to not be a good format for testing. Do we want to replace it with a vendor specific NSD.


Related issues

Related to Server - Issues #649: Should vendors be required to provide a vendor specific NSD instead of MICSClosedActions
#1

Updated by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago

  • Related to Issues #649: Should vendors be required to provide a vendor specific NSD instead of MICS added
#2

Updated by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
#3

Updated by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
#4

Updated by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to New
#5

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from Is MICS to be depricated to Is MICS to be deprecated
  • Status changed from New to In Progress

TPWG: Michael will discuss this at the TF UF. What are the requirements for MICS from users point of view

#6

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Triage
#7

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Triage to Closed
  • Closed Reason Future Improvement added
#8

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 3 years ago

  • Final Decision set to Issue forwarded to UF TF

Also available in: Atom PDF