Project

General

Profile

Feature #587

LNodeTypes and DOTypes not used in the IED section - is it allowed to keep them in DataTypeTemplate section?

Added by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Solved / Missunderstanding
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
1404
Source:
IOP_2019
TF Unique ID:
1404 # IOP_2019
WG10 Proposal:

It is allowed to maintain unused data types so the tool must handle it. No standard issue.

Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:

Unused types may be removed by the SCT. No guarantee that they are conserved in the SCD file.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

In DataTypeTemplate, 125 LNodeTypes are not used in the IED section of the ICD file.
Example of error :
ERROR: [SemanticConstraints] Unused LNodeType (id=LLN0_4) (line 156483) there is no LN or LNode referring this LNodeType

In addition, 3 DOTypes are not used in the IED section of the ICD file.
Example of error :
ERROR: [SemanticConstraints] Unused DOType (id=ENC_0) (line 161929) there is no DO or SDO referring this DOType

Is it allowed / usefull to keep all these unused LNodeTypes and DOTypes in the DataTypeTemplate section ?

#1

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from In DataTypeTemplate, 125 LNodeTypes are not used in the IED section of the ICD file. Example of error : ERROR: [SemanticConstrai to LNodeTypes and DOTypes not used in the IED section - is it allowed to keep them in DataTypeTemplate section?
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Standard(s) changed from 6 to IEC 61850-6
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done.

Also available in: Atom PDF