CIM Issues #5849
Association between AggregateNode and Pnode
The association between AggregateNode and Pnode should be instead to AggregatedPnode.
The association is actually only between AggregateNode and AggregatedPnode. There is no use case to support a need for the association between the AggregateNode and IndividualPnode. Therefore the association should be removed from Pnode and added instead to AggregatedPnode. Existing cardinality is many to many, what should this cardinality actually be? 0..1 to 0..1 or 0..many to 0..many?
2/17/2022: Cardinality; set to 0..1 -> 0..1; no known use case to support the many to many at this time. Agreed to change the association (add new and remove the existing).