Project

General

Profile

Feature #573

Tap Changer Supervision: Tap discrepancy (3 pole transformer case)

Added by Herbert Falk almost 2 years ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
45
Source:
ENTSO-E
TF Unique ID:
45 # ENTSO-E
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (Vladan C) To send for comments to H31.
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

To have similar solution like Pole discrepancy in XCBR (to extend YLTC)19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-4

Needs More Information:
Yes

Description

Tap Changer Supervision: Tap discrepancy (3 pole transformer case)

There is a need to model this functionality in IEC 61850.

#1

Updated by Herbert Falk almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#2

Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 2 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Short Proposal changed from To have similar solution like Pole discrepancy in XCBR (to extend YLTC) 19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done) to To have similar solution like Pole discrepancy in XCBR (to extend YLTC)19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-7-4
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done.

#3

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No
  • Needs More Information set to Yes

Since there is no representation from ENTSO-E anymore we can close these tickets for now. Additionally, we can eventually re-open if in the future similar needs are identified by other users.

Also available in: Atom PDF