Project

General

Profile

Support #558

Busbar protection (BBP): Diff/Kirchoff BBP

Added by Herbert Falk over 4 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
02/16/2021
Due date:
08/16/2021
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
30
Source:
ENTSO-E
TF Unique ID:
30 # ENTSO-E
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (Vladan C) To send for comments to H31.
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

ENTSO-E to submit additional information.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-4

Needs More Information:
Yes
Assigned TF:

Description

Busbar protection (BBP): Diff/Kirchoff BBP

#1

Updated by Herbert Falk over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#2

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 4 years ago

  • Short Proposal changed from • Option 1: use PDIF instance per zone, but we could need additional DO and DA to the PDIF to cover busbar specific signals • Option 2: we need a new LN for the busbar diff protection ? prefered solution of WG10 To create new LN in protection domain 19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done) to • Option 1: use PDIF instance per zone, but we could need additional DO and DA to the PDIF to cover busbar specific signals• Option 2: we need a new LN for the busbar diff protection ? prefered solution of WG10To create new LN in protection domain19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-7-4
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done.

#3

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 4 years ago

  • Due date set to 08/16/2021
  • Status changed from In Progress to Triage
  • Start date set to 02/16/2021
  • Short Proposal changed from • Option 1: use PDIF instance per zone, but we could need additional DO and DA to the PDIF to cover busbar specific signals• Option 2: we need a new LN for the busbar diff protection ? prefered solution of WG10To create new LN in protection domain19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done) to ENTSO-E to submit additional information.
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No

ENTSO-E to submit additional information.
• Option 1: use PDIF instance per zone, but we could need additional DO and DA to the PDIF to cover busbar specific signals
• Option 2: we need a new LN for the busbar diff protection ? prefered solution of WG10To create new LN in protection domain
19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic)
To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)

#4

Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Triage to Closed
  • Needs More Information set to Yes

Since there is no representation from ENTSO-E anymore we can close these tickets for now. Additionally, we can eventually re-open if in the future similar needs are identified by other users.

Also available in: Atom PDF