CIM Issues #5238
Multiple Address associations
Status:
Review
Priority:
High
Author/Contact Info:
Jim Hosrtman / jim.horstman@strateture.com
Base Release:
CIM 101
Solution to be Applied To:
CIM 101
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
61968-Common
Breaking Change:
Yes
Breaking Change Description:
The refactored classes are used in WG14 Part 3, 6, and 8 profiles.
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG14, WG16
Requestor:
Jim Horstman
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:
Description
Provide capability to have 0..* address associations rather than limited attributes (3)
Proposed Solution
In conjunction with eliminating compound classes add class to which 0..* associations can be made
Related issues
Updated by Henry Dotson about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Open
- Author/Contact Info set to Jim Hosrtman / jim.horstman@strateture.com
- Base Release set to CIM 101
- Solution to be Applied To set to CIM 101
- Breaking Change changed from No to Yes
- Breaking Change Description set to The refactored classes are used in WG14 Part 3, 6, and 8 profiles.
- CIM Keywords 61968-Common added
- CIM Impacted Groups WG14, WG16 added
- CIM Impacted Groups deleted (
WG13)
Updated by Henry Dotson about 1 year ago
- Related to CIM Issues #5318: Address modeling is too complex added