Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4919

RMS verses instantaneous measurementsThe CIM should be abl

Added by Herbert Falk almost 3 years ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Author/Contact Info:
Kendall Demaree
Base Release:
IEC61970CIM14v13IEC61968CIM10v30combined
Solution to be Applied To:
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
10/03/2023
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
08/03/2010
Origination ID:
13_22
Originally Assigned To:

Description

RMS verses instantaneous measurements
The CIM should be able to exchange both RMS (as it does now) or instantaneous values for SCADA or PMU measurements. One should also be able to distinquish between an analog value being RMS or instantaneous within one exchange.


Proposed Solution

Could add an instantaneous/RMS flag or enumeration to Analog class.
cim:Measurement.instantaneous:Bool - If true, the analog value is an instantaneous value, if false, it may depend upon the measurementType, but normally this would be an RMS value.


Decision

Oslo 14 June 2023
Close the issue

Following also discussion on 23 Aug 2023 after 2 weeks review period decided to close the issue

#1

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov over 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from RMS verses instantaneous measurements The CIM should be abl to RMS verses instantaneous measurementsThe CIM should be abl
  • Status changed from Open to Review
  • Base Release changed from IEC61970CIM14v13 IEC61968CIM10v30 combined to IEC61970CIM14v13IEC61968CIM10v30combined
  • Proposed Solution updated (diff)

Is this actual or it should be closed?

#2

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov about 1 year ago

  • Decision updated (diff)
#3

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Review to Closed
  • Completion Date set to 10/03/2023
  • Decision updated (diff)

Also available in: Atom PDF