Support #473
An SCL file was provided that had a <Val> for an OctetString value. A question was raised as to the correct format for the value
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Solved / Missunderstanding
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
29
Source:
IOP_2013
TF Unique ID:
29 # IOP_2013
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:
Currently, the only data object attribute whose type is OCTETSTRING that could be defined in SCL is originator.orIdent.
Part 6 Ed. 1 Table 42: The standard is clear about the coding: RFC 2045.
However, this couldn't be check by the schema.
Standard(s):
Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:
Description
An SCL file was provided that had a <Val> for an OctetString value. A question was raised as to the correct format for the value.
61850-6 has 2 references that could be interpreted as providing the format specification for the value. One is RFC 2045, the other is the W3C XML Schema Part 2 specification. The W3C specification does not have an explicit definition for Octetstring. It is suggest that this is the format specified as:
“([0-9A-Fa-f][0-9A-Fa-f])( [0-9A-Fa-f][0-9A-Fa-f])”