Feature #447
Usage of IEDType - should it be mandatory?
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
4
Source:
IOP_2013
TF Unique ID:
4 # IOP_2013
WG10 Proposal:
According to Cathedral City meeting (ref. to UFTF-CathedralMOM20160219) this issue is closed.
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:
WG10 shall make a proposal
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-6
Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:
Description
The standard is clear about the need to rename duplicate DataTypeTemplates. However, the IEDType attribute is optional for the IED and DataTemplateTypes. Making this mandatory may help with efficient management of the DataTypeTemplate section.
Discuss the usage of IEDType and making of it mandatory
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from The standard is clear about the need to rename duplicate DataTypeTemplates. However, the IEDType attribute is optional for the I to Usage of IEDType - should it be mandatory?
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.