Project

General

Profile

Feature #447

Usage of IEDType - should it be mandatory?

Added by Herbert Falk over 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
4
Source:
IOP_2013
TF Unique ID:
4 # IOP_2013
WG10 Proposal:

According to Cathedral City meeting (ref. to UFTF-CathedralMOM20160219) this issue is closed.

Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:

WG10 shall make a proposal

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

The standard is clear about the need to rename duplicate DataTypeTemplates. However, the IEDType attribute is optional for the IED and DataTemplateTypes. Making this mandatory may help with efficient management of the DataTypeTemplate section.
Discuss the usage of IEDType and making of it mandatory

#1

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from The standard is clear about the need to rename duplicate DataTypeTemplates. However, the IEDType attribute is optional for the I to Usage of IEDType - should it be mandatory?
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No

Checking done.

Also available in: Atom PDF