Project

General

Profile

Support #419

Also many other features of GOOSE messaging are left to the manufacturer to choose.

Added by Herbert Falk over 1 year ago. Updated 2 months ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard options reduction required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
10.2
Source:
ENTSO-E
TF Unique ID:
10.2 # ENTSO-E
WG10 Proposal:

some Options may be eliminated; will be analysed by WG10. Example PIXIT_GS4: the behaviour should probably be defined in the standard.To review all PIXIT with regard to (a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or (b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL file to make them machine processable.(20180613)WG 10 (completion date Ed 3), standard 7-2, for example PIXIT Gs4 should be defined in standard? To review complete PIXIT with regards:a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL to make them machine processablec) If a lower value StNum is received and it is not the case of rollover and there is no communication loss then the older/lesser StNum shall be ignored. – to update 7-2. (Thierry D., Herb F.). To check 8-1 in case that there Is a need for a change (Herb F.).

Estimated Completion:
ED3 (Tasl leader to inform editors 7-2)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

Some of the GOOSE options maynot be required

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-2


Description

Also many other features of GOOSE messaging are left to the manufacturer to choose.

#1

Updated by Herbert Falk over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#2

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 2 months ago

  • WG10 Proposal changed from some Options may be eliminated; will be analysed by WG10. Example PIXIT_GS4: the behaviour should probably be defined in the standard. To review all PIXIT with regard to (a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or (b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL file to make them machine processable. (20180613) WG 10 (completion date Ed 3), standard 7-2, for example PIXIT Gs4 should be defined in standard? To review complete PIXIT with regards: a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL to make them machine processable c) If a lower value StNum is received and it is not the case of rollover and there is no communication loss then the older/lesser StNum shall be ignored. – to update 7-2. (Thierry D., Herb F.). To check 8-1 in case that there Is a need for a change (Herb F.). to some Options may be eliminated; will be analysed by WG10. Example PIXIT_GS4: the behaviour should probably be defined in the standard.To review all PIXIT with regard to (a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or (b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL file to make them machine processable.(20180613)WG 10 (completion date Ed 3), standard 7-2, for example PIXIT Gs4 should be defined in standard? To review complete PIXIT with regards:a) eliminate them by making the standard stronger or b) transfer them to the PICS/service section of SCL to make them machine processablec) If a lower value StNum is received and it is not the case of rollover and there is no communication loss then the older/lesser StNum shall be ignored. – to update 7-2. (Thierry D., Herb F.). To check 8-1 in case that there Is a need for a change (Herb F.).
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No
  • Standard(s) changed from 2-Jul to IEC 61850-7-2

Also available in: Atom PDF