CIM Issues #6822
Why are WindTurbineType1or2Dynamics models required to link to another AsynchronousMachineDynamics model rather than directly associating with the AsynchronousMachine?
Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Base Release:
Grid18v10
Solution to be Applied To:
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
61970-Dynamics
Breaking Change:
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:
Description
What is the use case for an AsynchronousMachineDynamics model which then has an additional WindTurbineType1or2Dynamics model? Could the WindTurbineType1or2Dynamics models have a direct association with the AsynchronousMachine? Seems the WindTurbineType3or4Dynamics models are associated directly to the PowerElectronicsConnection. (no need for associations with additional dynamics models)
Proposed Solution
Add an optional association between WindTurbineType1or2Dynamics and AsynchronousMachine.
No data to display