Feature #593
How to disable SV control blocks that are not in use?
Added by Herbert Falk over 3 years ago.
Updated over 2 years ago.
Category:
Standard clarification required
TF Unique ID:
1601 # IOP_2019
WG10 Proposal:
IEC 16850-8-1 Ed2.1 states that if GOOSE or SV is not fully configured, it will not be published.CBR: An editorial tissue to part 6 will be created to clarify it.Refer to Tissue #1241 related to GOOSE.Feb-20: It will be available in 8-1 and 9-2 Ed2.1 that if GSE or SMV is not present, then the GOOSE or SV Control Block will not be published.No update on part 6 is neccesary
Estimated Completion:
20-Feb
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Description
It is unclear, how to disable SV control blocks that are not in use.
No SV control block can be deleted. How do we indicate, which ones we want to send and which ones we want to disable? Is it allowed to not provide to the unused SMVC a communication address?
- Subject changed from It is unclear, how to disable SV control blocks that are not in use.
No SV control block can be deleted. How do we indicate, whi to How to disable SV control blocks that are not in use?
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Standard(s) changed from 6 to IEC 61850-6
- WG10 Proposal changed from IEC 16850-8-1 Ed2.1 states that if GOOSE or SV is not fully configured, it will not be published.
CBR: An editorial tissue to part 6 will be created to clarify it.
Refer to Tissue #1241 related to GOOSE.
Feb-20: It will be available in 8-1 and 9-2 Ed2.1 that if GSE or SMV is not present, then the GOOSE or SV Control Block will not be published.
No update on part 6 is neccesary to IEC 16850-8-1 Ed2.1 states that if GOOSE or SV is not fully configured, it will not be published.CBR: An editorial tissue to part 6 will be created to clarify it.Refer to Tissue #1241 related to GOOSE.Feb-20: It will be available in 8-1 and 9-2 Ed2.1 that if GSE or SMV is not present, then the GOOSE or SV Control Block will not be published.No update on part 6 is neccesary
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Confirm to IEC 61850-6 editor the issue has been accounted for
Also available in: Atom
PDF