https://redmine.ucaiug.org/https://redmine.ucaiug.org/favicon.ico?15861924492023-02-07T17:08:23ZUCAIug Issue Tracking SystemWG13 Issues - CIM Issues #4805: ERCOT CombinedCycleConfiguration and CombinedCycleStateTransitionhttps://redmine.ucaiug.org/issues/4805?journal_id=49772023-02-07T17:08:23ZChavdar Ivanovchavdar.ivanov@griddigit.eu
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>ERCOT Combined cycle
Combined Cycle plan- added Configurati</i> to <i>ERCOT Combined cycleCombined Cycle plan- added Configurati</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Review</i></li></ul><p>WG13 to discuss with WG16 if we can move these classes to 61970. Now they are in 62325 package</p> WG13 Issues - CIM Issues #4805: ERCOT CombinedCycleConfiguration and CombinedCycleStateTransitionhttps://redmine.ucaiug.org/issues/4805?journal_id=56892023-06-15T09:58:20ZPat Brown
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>ERCOT Combined cycleCombined Cycle plan- added Configurati</i> to <i>ERCOT CombinedCycleConfiguration and CombinedCycleStateTransition</i></li><li><strong>Proposed Solution</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/5689/diff?detail_id=8026">diff</a>)</li></ul><p>Oslo 15 June 2023 - reviewed classes in 62325 package and believe that they make sense where they are as they support the sort of optimisation / scheduling. Suggest issue be closed.</p> WG13 Issues - CIM Issues #4805: ERCOT CombinedCycleConfiguration and CombinedCycleStateTransitionhttps://redmine.ucaiug.org/issues/4805?journal_id=60732023-10-03T08:13:43ZChavdar Ivanovchavdar.ivanov@griddigit.eu
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Review</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Completion Date</strong> set to <i>10/03/2023</i></li><li><strong>Decision</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/6073/diff?detail_id=8788">diff</a>)</li></ul>