Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4763

While addressing 641, you've wrongly swapped role names, pr

Added by Herbert Falk over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Tatjana Kostic
Base Release:
Solution to be Applied To:
IEC61970CIM12r03
Solution Version:
CIM11
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
CIM11
Origination Date:
01/18/2008
Origination ID:
696
Originally Assigned To:

Description

While addressing 641, you've wrongly swapped role names, probably because the text (on diagram) was misplaced/swapped. So, now you have ValueAliasSet role designating Command class, and Commands role designating ValueAliasSet.

Proposed Solution

Swap role names.

Decision

Well used association. Graphic in Rose was misleading. Model is now incorrect. Fix this for CIM12r03 release candidate for CIM12.

No data to display

Also available in: Atom PDF