Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4110

Mixed equipment control There is a need to clarify that "mi

Added by Herbert Falk over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
ENTSO-E N1-2
Base Release:
61970cim16v21
Solution to be Applied To:
61970cim16v22
Solution Version:
CIM16
Solution Applied By:
LOO
Completion Date:
06/05/2013
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
CIM16
Origination Date:
05/29/2013
Origination ID:
13_156
Originally Assigned To:

Description

Mixed equipment control
There is a need to clarify that "mixed regulatingControl on generators and transformer/shunts is allowed" including specification on what targetValue should be (i.e. to be the same so that the controls not diverge in the solution). IOP suggests to update the description on RegulatingControl to say in case there is multiple controls regulating same terminal there must be only one RegulatingControl with the same kind, which is enabled.

Proposed Solution

Proposed text for RegulatingControl:
In case multiple equipment, possibly of different types, control same terminal there must be only one RegulatingControl at that terminal. The most specific subtype of RegulatingControl shall be used in case such equipment participate in the control, e.g. TapChangerControl for tap changers.
For flow control load sign convention is used, i.e. positive sign means flow out from a TopologicalNode (bus) into the conducting equipment.

Added documentation on RegulatingControl.discrete "This applies to equipment with discrete controls, e.g. tap changers and shunt compensators."

Decision

Updated 2013-06-05/LOO

No data to display

Also available in: Atom PDF