Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4033

Planning control area issue Planning area issue - Doug Evan

Added by Herbert Falk over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
wg 13 - CIM for Planning - by Kendall Demaree
Base Release:
Solution to be Applied To:
Solution Version:
CIM16
Solution Applied By:
KDD
Completion Date:
12/14/2011
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
CIM16
Origination Date:
01/29/2008
Origination ID:
707
Originally Assigned To:

Description

Planning control area issue
Planning area issue - Doug Evans of ERCOT (not hierarchical) ERCOT and Alberta - scaling load different than rest of control area. Selective reporting (zones cut wildly by zone). Want general vehicle to cover reporting. 61968:ZoneClass is a similar grouping. Two techniques (objects or ties) can be used to define a control area. Area control in powerflow. CALISO mapping to load area is not working well.

Proposed Solution

Alternate control area tie point definitions.
Should be able to reuse control area specification as long as multple or alternative control area definitons are allowed. Should CIM define these multple definitions or allow only one per exchange? Track down related control area issues. - Can use the same ones to label the purpose.
Ask question if the operations control area definitions are needed or if the planning control areas are needed.

Decision

(2011-12-14) agree to close with no change

No data to display

Also available in: Atom PDF