Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4019

BusNameMarker needs priority attribute To use the name mark

Added by Herbert Falk over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Kendall Demaree
Base Release:
61970cim15v32
Solution to be Applied To:
61970cim16v01
Solution Version:
CIM16
Solution Applied By:
KDD
Completion Date:
08/18/2011
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
CIM16
Origination Date:
08/18/2011
Origination ID:
13_96
Originally Assigned To:

Description

BusNameMarker needs priority attribute
To use the name markers we need a priority when multiple names are connected into one bus. This is from Statnett.

Proposed Solution

Add new attribute to the UML model of BusNameMarker
The suggestion it to use a priority number to define which cim:BusNameMarker should be used. Based on the cim:SynchronousMachine.referencePriority:
referencePriority 0..1 Integer - Priority of unit for use as powerflow voltage phase angle reference bus selection. 0 = don t care (default) 1 = highest priority. 2 is less than 1 and so on.
We suggest to add the attribute cim:BusNameMarker:
referencePriority 0..1 Integer - Priority of busbar for use as topology name. 0 = don t care (default) 1 = highest priority. 2 is less than 1 and so on.

(not yet discussed) KDD suggests name attribute simply "priority". We might consider a CIMDatatype of Priority.

Decision

Used name attribute simply "priority" in 61970cim16v01. Still need to discuss use of CIMDatatype for priority.

No data to display

Also available in: Atom PDF